The Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008
UK Statutory Instrument 2008 No. 1597 — creates 4 criminal offences.
- Made
- 19 June 2008
- In force from
- 29 December 2009
- Extent
- Not stated
- Subject
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheries
- Made under
- European Communities Act 1972
Explanatory note
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
These Regulations implement Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (O.J. No. L 157, 9.6.2006, p.24) on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (“the Machinery Directive”). The Machinery Directive revokes and replaces Directive 98/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to machinery (O.J. No. L 207, 23.7.98, p.1) with effect from 29 December 2009. Directive 98/37/EC was implemented in the United Kingdom by the Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 1992 (S.I. 1992/3063), as amended, which these Regulations revoke with effect from the same date. The Machinery Directive is a “New Approach” directive. New Approach directives aim to remove technical barriers to trade in particular products by harmonising national health and safety provisions applicable to such products when they are first placed on the market or put into service in the EEA. Products which comply with their requirements are “CE” marked and can be placed on the market and put into service throughout the EEA. The scope of the Regulations is set out in Part 1 (which also deals with other preliminary matters, such as commencement) and Part 2. In particular, regulations 4(2) and 6 set out the types of product which constitute “machinery” and “partly completed machinery” and are subject to the Regulations. Part 3 sets out the key obligations on those who place machinery or partly completed machinery on the market or put it into service (referred to in the Directive as “manufacturers or their authorised representatives” and in the Regulations as “responsible persons”). These obligations include ensuring the safety of products (by reference to the essential health and safety requirements set out in Part 1 of Schedule 2); following a “conformity assessment procedure” (regulations 10 to 12); and documenting their compliance with the requirements of the Directive in various ways (notably by drawing up an “EC declaration of conformity” and affixing the CE marking to the product). Part 4 makes further provision about CE marking. Part 5 is concerned with the activities of “notified bodies”, whose function is to assess the conformity of products with the Regulations. Part 6 makes provision about enforcement. One of the functions of the Machinery Directive is to redefine the boundary between the regulation of machinery in general and the regulation of passenger lifts under the “Lifts Directive” (Directive 95/16/EC, O.J. No. L 213, 7.9.1995, p.1). Regulation 25 makes the changes to the United Kingdom regulations implementing the Lifts Directive (the Lifts Regulations 1997 (S.I. 1997/831)) which the Machinery Directive requires. The remaining provisions of Part 7 make consequential changes to or avoid overlaps with other pieces of legislation, as well as rectifying some technical drafting defects in regulations implementing other New Approach Directives. An Impact Assessment (IA) in respect of these Regulations is available and a copy can be obtained from the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. As these Regulations transpose the Machinery Directive, a transposition note (TN) setting out how the Government will transpose the Directive into UK law has been prepared. Copies of the IA and TN are available from the Business Group, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET. Copies of these documents have been placed in the libraries of both Houses of Parliament.
Offences created by this instrument
- A person who contravenes or fails to comply with— a a requirement of regulations 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 or 15; or b a… regulation 22(1) · Revoked · Strict liability
- A person who is guilty of an offence as a result of having contravened or failed to comply with— a regulation 7(2)(b),… regulation 22(3) · Revoked · Strict liability
- Liability of persons other than the principal offender regulation 24 · Revoked · Strict liability
- Liability of persons other than the principal offender regulation 24(2) · Revoked · Strict liability
What Parliament said about it
Contributions, debates and written statements mentioning this instrument by name. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
- Pedicabs (London) Bill [HL]
Lords · Grand Committee · 11 December 2023 · Lord Davies of Gower (Con)
My noble friend raises a very valid point and something that we will take into account. Amendment 19, in the names of my noble friends Lord Blencathra and Lord Strathcarron, Amendment 20, in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Liddle, and Amendment 21, in the names of my noble friend Lord Blencathra and the noble Lords, Lord Berkeley, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath and Lord Foster of Bath, all relate to Clause 2(6) of the Bill, so I will address them together. The matters listed under Clause 2(6) are intended to provide a discretion for Transport for London to determine what is most appropriate in…
- Pedicabs (London) Bill [HL]
Lords · Lords Chamber · 30 January 2024 · Lord Davies of Gower (Con)
My Lords, I thank your Lordships for their diligence in scrutinising this Bill’s provisions. This second group of amendments is focused on electric pedicabs. My department is aware of concerns held by noble Lords surrounding batteries in e-cycles and e-scooters. Amendment 2 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Randerson, seeks to place a requirement on the Government to introduce independent conformity assessment processes for electrically powered pedicabs and the batteries used to power these vehicles. If I may say so, she Baroness puts her case well, and I will now seek to answer some…
- E-scooters: Deaths and Serious Injuries
Commons · Westminster Hall · 22 May 2024 · Anthony Browne
Clearly I agree. All road deaths are absolutely tragic, but that is why it is so important that we get it right. I will come to some of the hon. Gentleman’s comments, but these scooters are completely illegal at the moment. Anything we do to regulate them or legislate on them would be legalising something that is currently illegal; presumably that would make them more widely used. That is why it is important that we learn about their safety features, the way they are used, what the age limit should be and whether we should legally require helmets, licences or whatever else. Other countries,…
- Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL]
Lords · Grand Committee · 20 November 2024 · Lord Foster of Bath (LD)
My Lords, I support my noble friend’s amendment and the amendment that is still to be debated by the noble Lord, Lord Sharpe. The amendment that I propose is to strengthen and future-proof the Government’s ability to identify and respond to high-risk products on the UK market. It proposes a clear mechanism to flag high-risk products and then requires them to be subject to additional safety measures. Such products would have to be, for example, conformity assessed by a UK-approved body and marked with subsequent CE and UKCA marking. The concept of high-risk products with special requirements…
How Parliament handled it
Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.
Check the source
- This instrument on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text, including amendments made since
- Other instruments from 2008