The Railways Infrastructure (Access and Management) Regulations 2005
UK Statutory Instrument 2005 No. 3049 — creates 1 criminal offence.
- Made
- 1 November 2005
- In force from
- 28 November 2005
- Extent
- Not stated
- Subject
- Transport: maritime, aviation, rail and harbours
- Made under
- European Communities Act 1972
Explanatory note
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
These Regulations implement Council Directive 91/440/EEC dated 29 July 1991 on the development of the Community’s railways, as amended by Directive 2001/12/EC dated 26 February 2001 and Directive 2004/51/EC dated 29 April 2004, both of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Council Directive 2001/14/EC dated 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure, as amended by Directive 2004/49/EC dated 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community’s railways, both of the European Parliament and of the Council. With noted exceptions relating to amendments to primary legislation, these Regulations do not apply to Northern Ireland. Part 1 contains preliminary provisions. Part 2 grants access and transit rights to international groupings and freight operators to the entire rail network in Great Britain, including access to terminals and ports linked to the rail network. It also grants all applicants certain rights of access to, and the supply of, the services listed in Schedule 2 to the Regulations. Part 3 imposes certain separation requirements between the bodies responsible for management of the railway infrastructure (“infrastructure managers”) and railway undertakings. Infrastructure managers are placed under a requirement to produce a network statement containing the information set out in regulation 11. Part 4, together with Schedule 3, sets out the structure for the charging of fees for the use of railway infrastructure, and the charging principles. Part 5, together with Schedule 4, sets out the framework and timetable for the process of allocating infrastructure capacity. The trading of capacity is prohibited, and allocation in the form of fixed train paths cannot be granted for longer than one timetable period. Regulations 23 to 25 set out the procedure that must be followed where an element of the railway infrastructure is congested, and regulation 26 provides a “use it or lose it” provision in respect of allocated capacity. Part 6 allocates certain regulatory functions to the Office of Rail Regulation (“ORR”). Regulation 29 provides a right of appeal to the ORR for applicants aggrieved with various aspects of the allocation of capacity and the fees charged for the use of that capacity, and requires the ORR to make a decision on such appeals within two months. Regulation 30 requires the ORR to monitor competition in the rail services market and to take appropriate action to deal with undesirable developments in the market, either arising out of its own investigations, or from complaints which have been submitted. Regulation 32 provides for the abolition of the International Rail Regulator. Schedule 1 contains consequential amendments and repeals to the Railways Act 1993, the Channel Tunnel Rail Link Act 1996, and other miscellaneous provisions. A Regulatory Impact Assessment has been prepared and copies can be obtained from the Department for Transport, Great Minster House, 76 Marsham Street, London SW1P 4DR. A copy has been placed in the Library of each House of Parliament. A copy of the Transposition Note is also available from the Department for Transport. Copies of the Regulatory Impact Assessment and of the Transposition Note may also be accessed on the HMSO website www.opsi.gov.uk.
Offences created by this instrument
- Making of false statements etc regulation 37(1) · Revoked · Requires proof of a state of mind
What Parliament said about it
Contributions, debates and written statements mentioning this instrument by name. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
- Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill
Lords · Grand Committee · 12 March 2008 · Lord Bassam of Brighton
We have been over this territory before, but it is perhaps worth setting it out some more. The Bill is a preliminary step towards the restructuring of LCR's constituent businesses. One of the purposes of that restructuring is to separate those three businesses—HS1 infrastructure, its interest in Eurostar and its property business—and sell them. The first sale anticipated is that of the HS1 infrastructure, which is planned to take place in 2009. As a result of that sale, Eurostar and HS1 will no longer be in common ownership, and therefore the vertical links that currently exist will be…
- Channel Tunnel Rail Link (Supplementary Provisions) Bill
Lords · Grand Committee · 12 March 2008 · Lord Bassam of Brighton
As the noble Lord will know, access charges for HS1 must be set in accordance with the charging framework established by the Secretary of State through the development agreement—I have explained that several times today. The amendments would change that arrangement so that the charging framework would be set by the Office of Rail Regulation by way of a periodic review. We do not think that HS1 should be subject to full economic regulation by the Office of Rail Regulation—I have made that clear in earlier debates. That regime was designed for a different type of asset base—a historic and…
- Crossrail Bill
Lords · Grand Committee · 26 June 2008 · Lord Bassam of Brighton
The thanks have all been given. I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Hanningfield, and my noble friends Lord Brooke and Lord Berkeley. The committee did a first-rate job and I, too, am sorry that the noble Viscount, Lord Colville, is not here to hear his praises sung. He did an extremely good job. When I found a bit of spare time to listen to the committee’s proceedings, he certainly demonstrated a firm grip on events. I found the committee itself extremely interesting. All those who made their representations through that process will have felt that they had a fair hearing. The report…
- Crossrail Bill
Lords · Grand Committee · 26 June 2008 · Lord Bradshaw
I too thank all noble Lords who participated in the proceedings of the Bill committee, particularly the two present. I fully endorse what the noble Lord, Lord Hanningfield, said about there needing to be a single infrastructure manager and I believe that it should be Network Rail. I would like to touch on the question of the application of the Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006 and the Railways Infrastructure (Access and Management) Regulations 2005. It is important that Crossrail is managed and constructed in accordance with the regulations and that,…
How Parliament handled it
Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.
Check the source
- This instrument on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text, including amendments made since
- Other instruments from 2005