UK Offence Report

The Potatoes Originating in Egypt (England) Regulations 2004 (revoked)

UK Statutory Instrument 2004 No. 1165 — creates 1 criminal offence.

1offences created
0recorded in force
0revoked
Made
19 April 2004
In force from
15 May 2004
Extent
Not stated
Subject
Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
Made under
European Communities Act 1972

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Order) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

These Regulations, which apply only in relation to England, consolidate with amendments the Potatoes Originating in Egypt Regulations 1998 (“the 1998 Regulations”). The Regulations implement Commission Decision 2004/4/EC (OJ No. L2, 6.1.2004, p.50) authorising Member States temporarily to take additional measures against the dissemination of Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) Smith (now known as Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) Yabuuchi et al.) as regards Egypt (“the Decision”). The Decision permits potatoes originating in Egypt, other than seed potatoes, to be imported into England only if the measures laid down in the Decision are complied with. It consolidates and repeals Commission Decision 96/301/EC (as amended). Regulation 3(1) makes provision in respect of the phytosanitary certificate required by the Plant Health (Great Britain) Order 1993 (“the 1993 Order”) to accompany imports of potato tubers into England, and without which such imports are prohibited. In the case of potatoes originating in Egypt, the certificate must comply with the additional requirements imposed by the Decision. Any person who imports such potatoes without a valid phytosanitary certificate in contravention of the prohibition imposed by the 1993 Order with intent to evade such prohibition is guilty of an offence under section 50(3) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (c. 2) and may be arrested. Any person found guilty of such an offence under section 50(3) is liable, on summary conviction, to a penalty of £5,000 or of three times the value of the goods, whichever is the greater, or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months, or to both; or, on conviction on indictment, to a penalty of any amount, or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years, or to both. This offence replaces the similar offence contained in the 1998 Regulations. A person found guilty of the offence under the 1998 Regulations would be liable on summary conviction to a fine of £5,000. Regulation 3(2) removes, in respect of imports of potatoes originating in Egypt, the requirement under the 1993 Order for imports of potatoes to be accompanied by an official statement that the potatoes originate in areas where Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) Yabuuchi et al. is not known to occur. Regulation 4 imposes a requirement for premises (other than certain premises used for the packing or preparation of potatoes for delivery to the final consumer) used for treating potatoes originating in Egypt to be approved for that purpose by the Secretary of State. Failure to comply with this requirement is an offence carrying liability on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale (currently £5,000) (regulation 7). Regulation 5 makes provision for the enforcement of the Regulations by inspectors and regulation 6 provides the Secretary of State with a power to charge a fee of £37.50 for the taking of samples from potatoes originating in Egypt to ascertain whether they are infected with Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) Yabuuchi et al. in accordance with the Decision. This is unchanged from the fee payable in respect of such sampling under the 1998 Regulations. No Regulatory Impact Assessment has been prepared for these Regulations.

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.

Check the source