The Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002
UK Statutory Instrument 2002 No. 2013 — creates 1 criminal offence.
- Made
- 30 July 2002
- In force from
- 21 August 2002
- Extent
- Not stated
- Subject
- Energy, communications, water and utilities
- Made under
- European Communities Act 1972
Explanatory note
(This note is not part of the regulations) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
These Regulations implement Articles 3, 5, 6, 7(1), 10 to 14, 18(2) and 20 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce) (“the Directive”) except in those areas covered by the measures referred to in the paragraph below. These Regulations should be read with the Electronic Commerce Directive (Financial Services and Markets) Regulations 2002 (S.I. 2002/1775), the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2002 (S.I. 2002/1776), The Electronic Commerce Directive (Financial Services and Markets) (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (S.I. 2002/2015) and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) (Amendment) (Electronic Commerce Directive) Order 2002 (which is expected to be made shortly and to come into force on 21st August 2002). They make parallel provisions in those areas subject to regulation by the Financial Services Authority under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Regulation 3(1) sets out those matters excluded from the scope of the Regulations. Regulation 3(2) provides that the Regulations do not have prospective effect. Regulation 4(1) makes requirements within the coordinated field apply to the provision of an information society service by a service provider established in the United Kingdom irrespective of whether that service is provided in the United Kingdom or in another member State. (Regulation 2(1) defines the coordinated field as requirements relating to the taking up and pursuit of the activity of an information society service and defines an information society service with reference to the definition in Article 2(a) of the Directive.) Enforcement authorities are required under regulation 4(2) to secure compliance with those requirements. Conversely, regulation 4(3) provides that requirements within the coordinated field are not to be applied to information society services provided by a service provider established in another member State for reasons which fall within the coordinated field where their application would restrict the freedom to provide information society services. By virtue of regulation 4(4), these provisions do not apply to those fields set out in the Schedule. Regulation 5 allows an enforcement authority or, where no enforcement authority is a party to the proceedings, a court to take measures exceptionally in respect of a given information society service in derogation from regulation 4(3), where these are necessary for reasons of public policy, public health, public security, and the protection of consumers and proportionate to those objectives. Regulation 6 imposes a duty on a person providing an information society service to make available to the recipient of that service certain information. Regulation 7 imposes a duty on a service provider to ensure that any commercial communications constituting or forming part of an information society service which he provides complies with certain requirements. Regulation 8 imposes a duty on a service provider to ensure that any unsolicited commercial communication sent by him is clearly and unambiguously identifiable as such as soon as it is received. Regulation 9 imposes a duty on a service provider to provide certain information where contracts are concluded by electronic means unless parties who are not consumers have agreed otherwise. Regulation 10 provides that regulations 6 to 9(1) have effect in addition to any other information requirements in Community law. These include those contained in the Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Regulations 2000 (S.I.2000/2334). Regulation 11 imposes requirements on the service provider in relation to the placing of an order unless parties who are not consumers have agreed otherwise. Regulations 13 to 15 set out the consequences of a failure to comply with regulations 6 to 9 and 11. Regulation 16 amends the Stop Now Orders (E.C. Directive) Regulations 2001 so that an application can be made under those Regulations for a court order to stop an infringement of the Directive which harms the collective interests of consumers. For this purpose, regulations 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11 of these Regulations are added to the list of the UK legislation implementing the Directives to which the 2001 Regulations apply. Regulations 17 to 19 create a defence for intermediary service providers from any liability incurred from the activities of mere conduits, caching and hosting in the circumstances set out in those regulations. Regulation 20 provides that regulations 17 to 19 do not preclude the agreement of different contractual terms or affect the rights of any party to apply to a court for relief or the power of any administrative authority to prevent or stop the infringement of any rights. Regulation 21 makes provision in relation to the burden of proof in criminal proceedings arising out of the circumstances in regulations 17 to 19. Regulation 22 makes provision in relation to matters which a court should have regard to when determining whether a service provider has actual knowledge for the purposes of regulations 18(b)(v) and 19(a)(i). A transposition note setting out how the main elements of the Directive are transposed into law and a regulatory impact assessment have been placed in the libraries of both Houses of Parliament. Copies are also available from the International Communications Unit, Department of Trade and Industry, Bay 206, 151 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 9SS.
Offences created by this instrument
- Internal market regulation 4(6) · Status not determined · Strict liability
What Parliament said about it
Contributions, debates and written statements mentioning this instrument by name. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
- Suicide Act
Commons · Written Statements · 17 September 2008 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Maria Eagle)
There has been growing concern in recent years about whether current law is adequate to deal with misuse of the internet to promote suicide and suicide methods. The Government share the concerns that have been expressed about such misuse, in particular about suicide websites and the influence they may have over vulnerable people, especially young people. In response to a question from my hon. Friend the Member for Bridgend (Mrs. Moon) on 11 March 2008, my right hon. Friend the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice said that we were looking at this issue and would make an…
- Suicide Act
Lords · Written Statements · 29 September 2008 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice (Lord Hunt of Kings Heath)
My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice (Maria Eagle) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. There has been growing concern in recent years about whether current law is adequate to deal with misuse of the internet to promote suicide and suicide methods. The Government share the concerns that have been expressed about such misuse, in particular about suicide websites and the influence they may have over vulnerable people, especially young people. In response to a Question from my honourable friend the Member for Bridgend (Madeleine…
- Data Protection Bill [Lords] (Eighth sitting)
Commons · Public Bill Committees · 22 March 2018 · Liam Byrne
I think it was in “Candide” that Voltaire introduced us to the word “Panglossian”, and we have heard a rather elegant and Panglossian description of a perfect world in which all is fine in the labour market. I am much more sceptical than the Minister. I do not think the current law is sufficiently sharp, and I am concerned that the consequence of that will be injustice for our constituents. The Minister raised a line of argument that it is important for us to consider. The ultimate test of whether the law is good enough must be what is actually happening out there in the labour market. I do…
- Offensive Weapons Bill
Commons · Commons Chamber · 28 November 2018 · Victoria Atkins
I thank all Members for a most interesting and informative debate. I want to clarify a point made by the hon. Member for Belfast East (Gavin Robinson) about the applicability of measures on corrosive substances in Northern Ireland. Those measures are within scope for Northern Ireland. It is possible for them to extend to Northern Ireland, and I will ask officials to look into that with their Northern Irish colleagues. I thank the right hon. Member for East Ham (Stephen Timms) for his contribution on new clause 23. Anyone who sells or hires, offers for sale or hire, exposes or has in his…
- Offensive Weapons Bill
Lords · Grand Committee · 6 February 2019 · Baroness Barran
I am grateful for the amendment moved by the noble Lord, Lord Kennedy, which seeks to make it a criminal offence when, “a website … is used to advertise, list or otherwise facilitate the sale of any weapon listed in Schedule 1 to the Criminal Justice Act 1988 … or any offensive weapon capable of being disguised as something else”. We can all agree on the spirit of the amendment. Indeed, in preparing my remarks, I spent five minutes googling what I could buy online. The noble Lord makes a good point: some very shocking weapons are easily accessible online. However, I hope to persuade him that…
- Offensive Weapons Bill
Lords · Grand Committee · 6 February 2019 · Lord Kennedy of Southwark
My Lords, Amendment 83 would insert a new clause into the Bill to make the owner of a website, be that an individual or a company, responsible for ensuring that weapons listed in Schedule 1 to the Criminal Justice Act are not advertised on their site. The Bill places responsibilities on shop workers, delivery people and others; making website owners responsible for their content should be welcomed by the Government. I asked a similar Question today about anonymous accounts and the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, made the point that when people are made responsible, things happen. If they are not…
How Parliament handled it
Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.
Check the source
- This instrument on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text, including amendments made since
- Other instruments from 2002