The Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 1999
UK Statutory Instrument 1999 No. 743 — creates 1 criminal offence.
- Made
- 11 March 1999
- In force from
- 1 April 1999
- Extent
- Not stated
- Subject
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheries
- Made under
- European Communities Act 1972, Schedule 3 to, the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
Explanatory note
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
These regulations impose requirements with respect to the control of major accident hazards involving dangerous substances. (The expressions “major accident” and “dangerous substances” are defined in regulation 2(1)). The Regulations implement Council Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major accident hazards involving dangerous substances, except Article 12 (which relates to land use planning). The Regulations apply to establishments (as defined in regulation 2(1)) where dangerous substances are present in quantities equal to or exceeding those specified in column 2 of Parts 2 or 3 of Schedule 1, except that regulations 7 to 14 apply to establishments where such substances are present in quantities equal to or exceeding those specified in column 3 of those Parts (regulation 3(1)). The Regulations do not apply in the cases specified in regulation 3(2). The competent authority for the purposes of the Regulations is the Health and Safety Executive and the Environment Agency acting jointly, except that in Scotland it is the Health and Safety Executive and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency acting jointly. The Regulations— a impose a duty on the operator of an establishment to take all measures necessary to prevent major accidents and limit their consequences for persons and the environment (regulation 4); b impose a duty on the operator to prepare a major accident prevention policy document containing specified information and to revise it in specified circumstances (regulation 5 and Schedule 2); c require the operator to notify the competent authority of specified matters at specified times (regulation 6 and Schedule 3); d require the operator to send at specified times a safety report to the competent authority containing specified information, to revise that report in specified circumstances, and not to start the construction or operation of the establishment until he has received from the competent authority the conclusions of its examination of the report (regulation 7 and Schedule 4); e require the operator to review and revise the safety report in specified circumstances (regulation 8); f require the operator to prepare an on-site emergency plan for specified purposes and containing specified information (regulation 9 and Schedule 5); g require, subject to any exemption that may be granted by the competent authority, the local authority to prepare an off-site emergency plan for specified purposes and containing specified information and require the operator to supply to the local authority the information necessary to enable the plan to be prepared (regulation 10 and Schedule 5); h require on-site and off-site emergency plans to be reviewed, tested and implemented (regulations 11 and 12), and empower the local authority to charge the operator a fee for preparing, reviewing and testing the off-site emergency plan (regulation 13); i require the operator to provide, after consulting the local authority, specified information to specified persons at specified times and to make that information publicly available (regulation 14 and Schedule 6); j require the operator to demonstrate to the competent authority that he has taken all measures necessary to comply with the Regulations (regulation 15(1)); k require the operator to provide, when requested to do so by the competent authority, information to the authority for specified purposes (regulation 15(2)); l require the operator to notify major accidents to the competent authority (regulation 15(3) and (4)); m require the operator to provide information to, and to co-operate with, other establishments in a group designated by the competent authority (regulation 16); n impose functions on the competent authority with respect to— i its consideration of the safety report sent by the operator (regulation 17); ii prohibiting the operation of an establishment (regulation 18); iii inspections and investigations (regulation 19); iv enforcement (regulation 20); and v the provision of information (regulation 21 and Schedules 7 and 8); o provide for fees to be payable by the operator to the Health and Safety Executive in relation to the performance of specified functions of the Executive or competent authority (regulation 22); p amend the Petroleum Consolidation Act 1928, the Petroleum-Spirit (Motor Vehicles etc.) Regulations 1929 and the Petroleum-Spirit (Plastic Containers) Regulations 1982 so as to disapply those Regulations to establishments subject to these Regulations and to sites subject to the Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous Substances Regulations 1982 (regulation 23); q revoke the Control of Industrial Major Accident Hazards Regulations 1984, and certain other instruments which amended them (regulation 24); r contain a transitional provision (regulation 25). A copy of the regulatory impact assessment prepared in respect of these Regulations can be obtained from the Health and Safety Executive, Economic Adviser’s Unit, Rose Court, 2 Southwark Bridge, London SE1 9HS. A copy has been placed in the library of each House of Parliament.
Offences created by this instrument
- Contravention of The Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 1999 the instrument as a whole · Status not determined · Strict liability
What Parliament said about it
Contributions, debates and written statements mentioning this instrument by name. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
- Health And Safety At Work
Commons · Westminster Hall · 14 March 2002 · Mr. Clifton-Brown
We have had all-embracing legislation since the 1974 Act was passed. Of course, where issues arise, it may be necessary to change the law, but as I shall show when I cite some European directives in a moment, we are going too far in the direction of "nanny state knows best." There used to be a maxim that sensational cases make bad law, and it is unrealistic to call for legislation every time something goes wrong. I want to raise three issues. The first is based on a representation that we received from the Engineering Employers Federation. The second, which has been brought to our attention…
- Fire and Rescue Services (Humberside)
Commons · Westminster Hall · 18 March 2008 · Mr. Austin Mitchell (Great Grimsby) (Lab)
It is a pleasure to speak for the first time under your chairmanship, Mrs. Humble, and I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Cleethorpes (Shona McIsaac) on securing a debate on this important issue. She is a dogged fighter for her constituents’ interests, and her contribution was another example of the fight that she puts up to protect them. My hon. Friend the Member for Brigg and Goole (Mr. Cawsey) brought a great deal of expertise on local government and its reactions to the proposals, but I should like to speak more generally about the issue. The essence of the union’s case against…
- Swansea Coastguard
Commons · Commons Chamber · 12 September 2011 · Martin Caton
My hon. Friend has a close association with the DVLA, and I know that she knows there is no overlap between its work and that of the coastguard. So, the Government say that Milford Haven should have the coastguard. What nonsense. Any logical method of deciding the best sites for operational effectiveness appears to have been abandoned and replaced with that strange new criterion, which can only be described as arbitrary at best. In responding, can the Minister please inform the House whether, when he and the Secretary of State decided to recommend closure of Swansea and retention of Milford…
- Energy Bill
Lords · Grand Committee · 9 July 2013 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence (Lord Astor of Hever)
My Lords, to date the clauses that are included within this Bill to enable the sale of the Government pipeline and storage system have received relatively little attention. Indeed, they were barely mentioned on Second Reading. This is why I welcome the clause stand part debate tabled by the noble Viscount, Lord Hanworth, as it provides an opportunity for us properly to scrutinise the proposals. Clause 113 is crucial because it allows for the sale or lease of the GPSS or a part of it. At the current time, the rights to operate and maintain the GPSS and to access land for this purpose are…
How Parliament handled it
Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.
Check the source
- This instrument on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text, including amendments made since
- Other instruments from 1999