UK Offence Report

The Food Safety (Live Bivalve Molluscs) (Derogations) Regulations 1992

UK Statutory Instrument 1992 No. 1508 — creates 1 criminal offence.

1offences created
0recorded in force
0revoked
Made
24 June 1992
In force from
1 July 1992
Extent
Not stated
Subject
Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted sales
Made under
Food Safety Act 1990

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

These Regulations relate to the implementation of Council Directive 91/492/EEC of 15th July 1991, laying down health conditions for the production and placing on the market of live bivalve molluscs ( “the Directive”). The Directive is to be implemented by 1st January 1993. One of the requirements of the Directive is that dispatch centres and purification centres are to be approved, only if they meet the requirements of the Directive. Amongst those requirements are requirements relating to equipment and structures, set out in Chapter IV of the Annex to the Directive. The Directive provides for member States to grant a derogation in respect of certain of the requirements relating to equipment and structures (set out in Commission Decision 92/92/EEC), provided that an application for the derogation is made before 1st July 1992 (see regulation 3). All of the requirements relating to equipment and structures are set out in Column (1) of the Schedule to these Regulations. Those which are capable of being the subject of a derogation are indicated appropriately in Column (2) of that Schedule. These Regulations set out the procedure to be followed on an application for a derogation (see regulation 4) and for how such an application is determined (see regulation 5). They do not implement the main substantive provisions of the Directive.

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.

Check the source