UK Offence Report

The Restriction on Pithing (Scotland) Regulations 2001 (revoked)

Scottish Statutory Instrument 2001 No. 73 — creates 2 criminal offences.

2offences created
0recorded in force
0revoked
Made
8 March 2001
In force from
Not determined
Extent
Not stated
Subject
Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted sales
Made under
European Communities Act 1972

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

These Regulations, which extend to Scotland only, give effect to Article 5 of Commission Decision 2000/418/EEC (O.J. No. L 158, 30.6.2000, p.70). These Regulations– a prohibit the use of the technique known as “pithing” in the slaughter of bovine, ovine or caprine animals for sale (given an extended meaning by regulation 2(2)(b)) for human or animal consumption (regulation 2(1)); b provide that all parts of the carcase (other than the hide) of an illegally pithed animal are deemed to be specified risk material for the purposes of the Specified Risk Material Order 1997 and the Specified Risk Material Regulations 1997, as amended in each case (regulation 3); c make a consequential amendment to the Welfare of Animals (Slaughter or Killing) Regulations 1995 (regulation 4). d give a power of entry to persons appointed as inspectors by the relevant enforcement authority (regulation 5); e create offences and penalties (regulations 2(3), 6 and 7); f specify who is to enforce them (regulation 8). A regulatory impact assessment which includes a compliance cost assessment of the effect which these Regulations have on business costs has been prepared and placed in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre. Copies may be obtained from the Meat Hygiene Division, Food Standards Agency, 6th Floor, St. Magnus House, 25 Guild Street, Aberdeen AB11 6NJ

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.

Check the source