UK Offence Report

The Apple and Pear Orchard Grubbing Up Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1998

Northern Ireland Statutory Rule 1998 No. 209 — creates 1 criminal offence.

1offences created
0recorded in force
0revoked
Made
10 June 1998
In force from
10 July 1998
Extent
Not stated
Subject
Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
Made under
European Communities Act 1972

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Regulations.) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

These Regulations revoke the Apple Orchard Grubbing Up Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1991 (S.R. 1991 No. 157), the Apple Orchard Grubbing Up (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1994 (S.R. 1994 No. 430) and the Apple Orchard Grubbing Up (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1995 (S.R. 1995 No. 15) (regulation 3). Those Grubbing Up Regulations provided for the administration and enforcement of a scheme for the payment of a premium to growers of apples who grubbed up their apple trees. The scheme was established for three separate periods between 1991 and 1995. Restrictions apply in relation to the grubbed land and areas of retained orchards and their occupiers and owners for the time being for fifteen years after recipients of premium had grubbed up apple trees under the scheme. These restrictions are preserved by regulation 4(2). A new Community scheme was established by Council Regulation (EC) No. 2200/97 (O.J. No. L.303, 6.11.97, p. 3). The detailed rules for the scheme are laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2467/97 (O.J. No. L.341, 12.12.97, p. 3). These Regulations provide for the administration and enforcement of the restrictions and other rules of the new scheme for the remainder of the fifteen year periods in which they will apply. Undertakings already given to the Department in relation to an application for premium that are being fulfilled when these Regulations come into operation are treated for the purposes of these Regulations as continuing to be fulfilled on the date they come into operation. Those undertakings which are not being fulfilled on that date are not so treated (regulation 4(1)). Regulation 5 of these Regulations provides for circumstances in which the grubbing up of apple and pear trees and replanting of apple, pear, peach or nectarine trees on the holding of the recipient of premium under the scheme may be permitted. In accordance with Article 3 of the Commission Regulation subsequent grubbing up of apple and pear trees and replanting of apple, pear, peach and nectarine trees is permitted providing the replanting does not extend the area of the holding planted with apple or pear trees. Prior notice of the intended grubbing up and replanting must be given to the Department and no replanting may be carried out before the intended grubbing up has been completed. Regulation 6 makes provision for the administration of the scheme rule that on a transfer of a holding affected by the grubbing up of apple or pear trees under the scheme the new owner must give an undertaking to comply with the rules of the scheme. Notice of the transfer and new undertaking must be given to the Department. Regulation 7 provides for recovery of premium and a fixed penalty, in accordance with Article 7(3) of the Commission Regulation, where the required undertakings have not been fulfilled during the fifteen year period of the scheme after the grubbing up concerned. Regulation 8 applies those sanctions where a required undertaking or notice has not been given. Regulation 9 provides for recovery of interest on premium repayable under the scheme rules. Regulation 10 confers powers of entry and inspection on persons authorised by the Department. Regulation 11 provides for offences and penalties for obstruction of authorised persons. Regulation 12 confirms that an amount recoverable or payable on demand under the Regulations is recoverable as a debt.

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.

Check the source